Enhancing Pronunciation, Fluency, and Vocabulary Through Targeted Instructional Grouping in Latin American EFL Contexts

Jacqueline López López; Alejandro Andrés Ponce-Mariscal

doi:10.66836/linguatech.v1n1.3

Authors

Jacqueline López López University of Guayaquil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-8103
Alejandro Andrés Ponce-Mariscal Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4547-4782

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66836/linguatech.v1n1.3

Keywords:

targeted instruction, instructional grouping, fluency, pronunciation, vocabulary development, A1 learners

Abstract

Targeted instructional grouping has emerged as a promising pedagogical strategy for improving specific oral communication skills among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. This study explores the effects of level-based instructional grouping on three essential components of oral proficiency—pronunciation, fluency, and vocabulary—among A1-level learners in a Latin American context. Drawing on eight weeks of structured intervention and informed by previous research on differentiated instruction, ability grouping, and CEFR-aligned speaking development, the study evaluates how grouping students by similar proficiency levels fosters measurable linguistic gains. A mixed-methods design was implemented, including diagnostic pre-tests and post-tests, classroom observations, and student surveys. Results revealed significant improvement in pronunciation and fluency, with moderate but consistent progress in vocabulary. Students reported increased confidence, reduced anxiety, and greater opportunities for oral interaction. Teachers acknowledged improved classroom management and more efficient instructional delivery. The findings suggest that targeted instructional grouping can provide a meaningful and supportive environment for oral-skill development in Latin American EFL settings, particularly when combined with communicative and task-based methodologies.

References

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002

British Council. (2013). The English effect: The impact of English, what it’s worth to the UK and why it matters to the world. British Council.

Cha, Y.-K., & Ham, S.-H. (2011). Educating supranational citizens: The incorporation of English language education into curriculum policies. American Journal of Education, 117(2), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1086/657887

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.3.325

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Longman.

Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000071

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733017

Mazenod, A., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2019). Nurturing learning or encouraging dependency? Teacher constructions of students in lower attainment groups in English secondary schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441372

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759

Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Prentice Hall.

Piccardo, E. (2016). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment—Phonological scale revision process report. Council of Europe.

Ramírez-Ávila, R. Á., & Viteri-Guevara, X. O. (2023). The effect of recorded dialogues in higher education students’ spoken performance. YUYAY: Estrategias, Metodologías & Didácticas Educativas, 2(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.59343/yuyay.v2i1.24

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wajnryb, R. (1992). Classroom observation tasks: A resource book for language teachers and trainers. Cambridge University Press.

Wu, C.-H., Tsai, C.-J., & Chiu, Y.-M. (2018). A longitudinal analysis of ability grouping with college EFL learners. TESOL International Journal, 13(1), 20–32.