Enhancing English Communicative Interaction through Gamified Mobile Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Secondary Education
Enhancing English Communicative Interaction through Gamified Mobile Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Secondary Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66836/linguatech.v2n1.3Keywords:
Gamification, Mobile learning, Communicative interactionAbstract
The development of English communicative skills remains a persistent challenge in secondary education, particularly in contexts where traditional methodologies limit opportunities for oral practice. This study aimed to analyze the impact of gamified mobile learning as a pedagogical strategy to enhance communicative interaction in English. A quasi-experimental design with a mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating both qualitative and quantitative data to assess students’ progress before and after the intervention. The sample consisted of secondary-level students who engaged in structured learning activities through a digital platform based on gamification principles. Diagnostic (pre-test) and final (post-test) assessments were administered, aligned with international language proficiency standards, with a focus on oral production and communicative interaction. The results revealed a significant improvement in students’ performance, particularly in fluency, pronunciation, and their ability to interact in communicative contexts. Additionally, an increase in motivation and active participation was observed, attributed to the interactive and adaptive nature of the digital learning environment. These findings suggest that gamified mobile learning is an effective tool for enhancing English communicative skills, promoting autonomous and meaningful learning processes.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.QualitativeResearch in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018).Research methods in education(8thed.). Routledge.Creswell, J. W. (2014).Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodsapproaches(4th ed.). SAGE Publications.Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elementsto gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” InProceedings of the 15th InternationalAcademic MindTrek Conference(pp. 9–15). ACM.https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040Dörnyei, Z. (2007).Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E.,& Hyun, H. H. (2012).How to design and evaluateresearch in education(8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.Jayanthi, N. S., & Kumar, R. V. (2016). Use of ICT in English language teaching andlearning.Journal of English Language and Literature, 3(2), 34–38.Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research(2nd ed., pp. 567–605).SAGE Publications.Piaget, J. (1952).The origins of intelligence in children. International UniversitiesPress.
Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2015). Exploring the effect of mobile learning on students’achievement and attitudes.Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in theWorld, 5(3), 23–28.Vasselinov, R., & Grego, J. (2012).Duolingo effectiveness study. City University ofNew York.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychologicalprocesses.Harvard University Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juan Rafael Campoverde López, Dayana Dailé Guzmán Brito, Rafael Diaz Gonzalez Plata (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


